VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vipin Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 November 2023
Case no.
A482 40950/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40950 of 2023 Applicant :- Vipin Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Shiromani Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Krishna Kant Yadav Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Heard Shri Ram Shiromani Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Krishna Kant Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.

¶2The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.7078 of 2019 (State Vs. Champat Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No.302 of 2018, under Sections-452, 308, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Bilari, District-Moradabad, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad in terms of compromise done between the parties.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that now parties have entered into compromise on 27.07.2023 and the same has also been verified by the trial Court vide order dated 22.09.2023, therefore, in light of compromise between the parties, the criminal proceeding against the applicants may be quashed.

¶4Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 has not objected the aforesaid facts and submitted that in case proceedings against the applicants is quashed, he would have no objection.

¶5In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶6Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.

¶7The present application is, accordingly allowed.

¶8No order as to costs. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 Amit/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.