Inam Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42165 of 2023 Applicant :- Inam Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Compromise affidavit along with vakalatnama filed on behalf of the opposite party is taken on record.

¶2Heard Shri Vijay Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Ramendra Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶3The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge-sheet dated 08.06.2014 as well as entire proceedings of Case Crime No.20 of 2014 (State Vs. Inam Singh and others), under Sections-323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., and Section 3 (1) (10) SC/ST Act, Police Station-Pidhaura, District-Agra, pending in the court of learned Additional Session Judge-II/Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Agra in terms of compromise done between the parties.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant submits applicants and opposite party No.2 are the residents of same village. He next submits that now parties have entered into compromise on

29.09.2023, therefore, in light of compromise between the parties, the criminal proceeding against the applicants may be quashed.

¶5Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 has not objected the aforesaid facts and submitted that in case proceedings against the applicants is quashed, he would have no objection.

¶6In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶7Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.

¶8The present application is, accordingly allowed.

¶9Trial Court is directed to ensure the deposit of compensation amount received by the opposite party No.2 before closing the proceedings of the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 Amit/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad