Sanjay Baheliya v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42121 of 2023 Applicant :- Sanjay Baheliya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Shekhar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶1Sri Arvind Kumar Rai, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 to 4, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and the learned A.G.A.

¶3This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 01 of 2015 (NCR No. 5/15 (State vs. Rajendra Chauhan & others), arising out of Case Crime No. 33/14, under Sections 323, 504 IPC and Section 3 (1)

(X) SC/ST Act, Police Station Ram Nagar, District Varanasi, pending in the court of Special Judge SC/ST Act, District Varanasi, on the basis of compromise.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant and the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 have reconciled their differences and a compromise has been entered between them, and the compromise deed is annexed as annexure-3 to the affidavit. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings before the court below and the same is not only sheer wastage of time of the Court but also abuse of process of law.

¶5Learned AGA, however, submits that it is the concerned court below, which has to verify the fact as to whether the parties have entered into compromise, hence the applicants may approach the concerned court below and move an application along with copy of compromise between the parties, which will be decided in accordance with law.

¶6In view of the above, the applicant and the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 are directed to appear before the court below along with compromise and an application for verification of compromise deed so filed as well as a certified copy of this order within two weeks from today. It is expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the compromise and after ensuring their presence, pass an appropriate order with respect to the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from today. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the concerned court shall also record the statement of the applicants and the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not.

¶7The court in that scenario will allow the applicant and the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶8For a period of two months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶9With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 v.k.updh. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad