- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 33629/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33629 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shamim Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aqeel Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
¶1Heard Sri Aqeel Ahmad, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing counsel for State respondents.
¶2Present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 and 3 to decide representation dated 10.06.2023 moved by petitioner which is pending before them within time stipulated fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
¶3Cause of action for filing the instant writ petition is no more existing and the same has been referred in the instructions called on the earlier occasion.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the averments made in the instructions and as such there is hardly any occasion arises in favour of the petitioner to pursue the instant writ petition.
¶5In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Shaswat High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.