- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 39728/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39728 of 2023 Petitioner :- Faiju Uddin Respondent :- Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam Ltd And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Narendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
¶2The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that the Executive Engineer, EUDD, Karelabagh,Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Allahabad is not deciding the objection filed by the petitioner under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005 filed against the bill regarding the period 2nd November, 2022 to 4th December, 2022.
¶3Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner or the maintainability of his objection under Clause 6.5 of the Code, 2005, the petition is disposed of with a direction
to
the
Executive
Engineer,
EUDD, Karelabagh,Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Allahabad to decide the aforesaid objection of the petitioner and take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Pratima High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.