- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36507/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 46 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36507 of 2023 Petitioner :- Seva Ram Kasana Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Bhahadur Yadav,Kamlesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
¶1Petitioner is aggrieved by a notice dated 20th September, 2023, which records that petitioner has raised construction on the public-drain. According to the petitioner, this assertion is not correct and has submitted his reply in that regard. Grievance is that without considering petitioner's reply, the State-authorities are trying to demolish the construction.
¶2None has accepted notice on behalf of respondents No. 2 to 4.
¶3Learned State Counsel, however, submits that in the event, petitioner has submitted a reply to the notice, the same shall be duly adverted to.
¶4In the facts of the case, we permit the petitioner to approach third respondent along with copy of his reply submitted to the notice within two weeks from today. The third respondent shall accord consideration to the petitioner's reply and pass appropriate order before proceeding any further in the matter.
¶5Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 LN Tripathi High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.