VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 November 2023
Case no.
WPIL 2466/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 52 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2466 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Azad Rai,Rajendra Prasad Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Dhananjay Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 3 and Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 as well as Sri Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.7.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer only to the extent that the respondent no.2 may be directed to expedite the disposal of restoration application dated 21.06.2022 for seeking recall of the order dated 14.09.2006 preferred by Gram Sabha in Case No.512(2) of 2006 (Siksha Vibhag Vs. Gaon Sabha Kushari) which is still pending to be adjudicated.

¶3Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 as well as Sri Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.7 showed their agreement to the extent that only a direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid restoration application within stipulated time.

¶4Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide the restoration application dated 21.06.2022 preferred by Gram Sabha in Case No.512(2) of 2006 (Siksha Vibhag Vs. Gaon Sabha Kushari), expeditiously.

¶5With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Vivek Kr. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.