VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Meenu Katiyar @ Meenu Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 November 2023
Case no.
A482 40003/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40003 of 2023 Applicant :- Meenu Katiyar @ Meenu Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Ojha,Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶2This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra to decide the case bearing Criminal Case No. 11363 of 2015 (State Vs. Shyam Singh) arising out of Case Crime No. 1251 of 2014, under Sections 498-A. 504. 506 IPC and section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar pending in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar expeditiously within stipulated period.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is first informant of the instant case and charges in the said instant case have already been framed on 23.09.2016, however, even after the lapse of more than 9 years the trial has not yet been concluded and has been lingering on, on one pretext or the other.

¶4In view of the above, learned court below is expected to make all endeavours to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order without giving any unnecessary adjournments to either parties, if there is no other legal impediment in concluding the trial.

¶5With the aforesaid direction, this application under Section 482 CrPC is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 RPD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.