Sarika Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 192 of 2023 Revisionist :- Sarika Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Vijay Anand Rai,Krishna Nand Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Virendra Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Virendra Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. This revision has been filed challenging the order of interim maintenance awarded to the revisionist @ Rs. 7000/- per month. Learned counsel for the revisionist argues that dispute arose with regard to working of the revisionist and the salary of opposite party. These issues can be settled in proceeding when they are finally decided. In view thereof, no interference is required at this stage. The revision is disposed of with a direction to the trial court, Varansi to decide the final maintenance application after considering the financial status of both the parties within a period of two months from today. However, the opposite party shall pay the interim maintenance as granted within a period of six weeks from today through a demand draft in favour of the revisionist in the trial court. It is further directed that both the parties shall file their personal affidavits, disclosing their final status within a period of six weeks from today. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Faridul High Court of Judicature at Allahabad