Sunil Kumar and 2 Others v. Jagdish,Seretary

Court No. - 9 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1287 of 2022 Applicant :- Sunil Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- Jagdish,Seretary Counsel for Applicant :- Grijesh Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Avneesh Tripathi Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. The writ Court on 24.01.2022 while disposing of Writ-A No. 18435 of 2021 passed the following order:- "Heard Sri Grijesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel for respondent nos. 1,2 and 3 Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.4 through video conferencing. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing respondents to issue the appointment letters to the petitioners in pursuance of the select list/ declaration of result dated

28.9.2020 and 30.9.2020 and in pursuance of the advertisement dated

15.3.2018 being Advertisement No. A-1/E-1/2018 for the post of Assistant Teacher (Trained Graduate) Men/ Women Branch Exam-2018 forthwith or within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners were selected from the select list dated 28.9.2020 and 30.9.2020 in pursuance of the advertisement dated 15.3.2018 for the post of Assistant Teacher (Hindi) Men and Women, Branch Examination-2018 but the appointment letters have not been issued to them. It is next submitted that they have moved a representation in this regard on 30.11.2021 before the respondent no.4 which remains pending till date. Learned Standing counsel as well as learned counsel counsel for the U.P. Public Service Commission submits that no useful purpose would be served to keep the writ petition pending and suitable direction may be issued by this Court to the respondent concerned to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 30.11.2021 in time bound manner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, direction is issued upon respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated

30.11.2021 in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified/computerized copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs" Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party states that representation of the applicants has been decided on

03.03.2022. Copy of which has been brought on record as Annexure-1 to compliance affidavit. In view of said fact, as the order of writ Court was only to the extent to decide the representation which the authorities have done, the contempt application is rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed. Contempt notice stands discharged. Order Date :- 21.11.2023 V.S.Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad