VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jhallo v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
20 November 2023
Case no.
CRLP 16650/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 45 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16650 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jhallo Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.

¶1Heard Sri Arun Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Virendra Kumar Pal, learned A.G.A for the State respondents.

¶2The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated

9.6.2023, registered as Case Crime No. 176 of 2023, under Sections 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Thariaon, District Fatehpur. Further prayer has been made not to arrest the petitioner in the aforesaid case.

¶3At the very outset, learned AGA submits that a charge-sheet has already been submitted against co-accused Mohd. Syed and FIR cannot be quashed in part. He further submits that co-accused arrested on spot has specifically taken name of the petitioner herein and that they both carried on offences as alleged.

¶4Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and no offence is made out against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the offence as alleged. The petitioner herein is a motor mechanic and he is not involved in cow slaughtering and transportation and there is no independent eye-witness.

¶5Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence. We find that spot arrested co-accused has assigned identical role to the petitioner herein and therefore, FIR cannot be quashed in part.

¶6Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 and in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.3262/2021 (Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & another vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh) decided on 07.10.2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report.

¶7Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 21.11.2023 Abhishek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.