- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 20 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 3856/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3856 of 2023 Petitioner :- Noorjahan And Another Respondent :- Consolidation Officer And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chitranshu Srivastav,Tabish Yusufi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶1Grievance of petitioners is that his Case No.921 of 1987 (Aamir Vs. Rukhiya) is pending before Consolidation Officer, Padrauna, District-Kushniagar (respondent No.1) and the same has not been decided till date.
¶2I have perused the order sheet annexed along with this writ petition. On various dates the Advocates have not appeared on the ground of their call for abstention from judicial work. Therefore, the Authority concerned cannot put on fault.
¶3At this stage, learned counsel for petitioners on instruction submits that petitioners undertake that on next as well as on subsequent dates either petitioners themself or through their Advocate shall appear before concerned authority and will not take any adjournment.
¶4Taking note of undertaking given by learned counsel for petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of that concerned Authority shall take endeavour to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from today, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 21.11.2023 P. Pandey High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.