Angoori Devi v. State of U.P

Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12804 of 2023 Applicant :- Angoori Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Dubey,Nanhe Lal Tripathi,Rahul Upadhyay,Susheel Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anand Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶1List revised.

¶2Heard Sri Nanhe Lal Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anand Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant Angoori Devi seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 433 of 2022, under sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Etmadpur, District Agra.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is argued that the applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The marriage of the deceased Kalpana @ Gudia with son of the applicant (Santosh Kumar) was solemnized on 12.02.2022. The applicant was living separately from the deceased and her husband. It is argued that general and omnibus allegations have been made in the FIR against the applicant and her family members. It is argued that although the deceased was found to have received a contused swelling also on left side face but the same did not contribute to her death as the cause of death was asphyxia as a result of hanging. The story regarding demand of dowry has seen the light of the day for the first time when the FIR has been lodged. The husband of the deceased is in jail. The applicant is lady and is entitled to get benefit under Section 437 Cr.P.C. It has also been pointed out that the applicant is not having any criminal history as stated in para 4 of the supplementary affidavit and is in jail since 28.01.2023.

¶5Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶6After having heard learned counsels for the parties and perusing the records, it is evident that the applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The cause of death is asphyxia as a result of ante mortem hanging. Santosh Kumar the husband of the deceased is in jail.

¶7Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶8Let the applicant-Angoori Devi, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence proclamation under section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her, in accordance with law, under section 174-A I.P.C.

(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against her under Section 229-A IPC.

(vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant.

¶9The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶10The bail application is allowed. Order Date :- 21.11.2023 K.K. Maurya (Samit Gopal,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad