Ajay Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41576 of 2023 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Jatan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

1.Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer clause during course of the day.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash non bailable warrants dated 16.10.2021 as well as entire proceeding of Sessions Case No. 2167 of 2020 (State Vs. Ajay Kumar), under section 8/20 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, P.S. G.R.P. Cantt, District Agra pending in the court of Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Court No. 13, Agra.

¶4After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicant is ready to appear before the court below and seek his bail and that his release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶5Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶6In view of the above, in case the applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and seeks bail, his release be considered as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. With the above observation, the instant 482 Cr.P.C. application stands disposed off. Order Date :- 21.11.2023 RPD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad