- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 20 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36825/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36825 of 2023 Petitioner :- Tahir Hussain And 2 Others Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bed Kant Mishra,Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Sanjay Kumar Om Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
¶1The impugned order purports to reject the prayer for mutation of the name of the petitioners in the records of Cantonment Board on the ground that in respect of part of subject land, which is old grant, there is no provision of mutation of name and in respect of remaining area i.e. 290 square feet, which is leased land, the lease has expired.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayer of the petitioner for renewal of lease has not been considered by the Cantonment Board so far. He submits that the petitioner be permitted to approach the authority with prayer for renewal of the lease.
¶3Sri Akash Sharma, holding brief of Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel for the Cantonment Board has no objection to the same.
¶4Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to press their prayer before the competent authority for renewal of lease and in which event, the prayer shall be considered strictly in accordance with law without being influenced by the fact that the application for mutation of name had been rejected. (Donadi Ramesh, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 21.11.2023 Noman High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.