Sapna @ Shristi v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 90 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22054 of 2023 Applicant :- Sapna @ Shristi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rama Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Virendra Singh Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.

¶1Heard Sri Rama Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA as well as Sri Virendra Singh, learned counsel for opposite party No.2.

¶2Learned counsel for applicant submits that in the present scenario present applicant is interested to file an anticipatory bail application instead of assailing the entire criminal proceeding in the instant application. As such, applicant may be permitted to withdraw the instant application at this stage.

¶3Learned AGA and learned counsel for opposite party No.2 have no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for applicant.

¶4Instant application is dismissed as prayed for. Order Date :- 21.11.2023 Md Faisal High Court of Judicature at Allahabad