VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajesh and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 15 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 November 2023
Case no.
WRIC 39673/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39673 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajesh And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kumar Pandey,Sandeep Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Sher Bahadur Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing Additional Commissioner(A), Bareilly Division, Bareilly, to decide the Case No.773/2019 being Computerized Case No.C201912000000773 (Rajesh and others vs. Omkar Singh and others), within stipulated period.

¶3Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that an appeal has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 14.2.2019 passed in proceedings u/s 176 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act and the same is pending consideration. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.

4.No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to Additional Commissioner(A), Bareilly Division, Bareilly, to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.