Hema Singh Baghel v. Union of India and Another

Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19273 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hema Singh Baghel Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Satendra Kumar Upadhyay Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶2At the very outset, Sri Satendra Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the matter is cognizable by Central Administrative Tribunal (C.A.T.) in the first instance as the railways stood notified under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid legal position.

¶4In view of the above, I decline to interfere in the matter at this stage. However, liberty rests with the petitioner to apply before the Central Administrative Tribunal, if so advised.

¶5Subject to what has been observed, petition is consigned to records. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 P Kesari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad