Ravindra Pathak v. State of U.P

Court No. - 37 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1320 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ravindra Pathak Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Murtuza Ali,Yogendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Shri Murtuza Ali, learned counsel assisted by Shri Imran Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer made by the petitioner is that the Excise Revision No. 32 (Revi.) of 2022 (Ravindra Pathak, District Aligarh Vs. Excise Commissioner and others) be decided by the Revisional Authority within a stipulated period of time. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any serious objection to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the revisional authorities are under an obligation of law to decide revisions within a reasonable period of time. In the wake of submissions of the learned counsels interest of justice shall be served by directing the revisional authority to decide the Excise Revision No. 32 (Revi.) of 2022 (Ravindra Pathak, District Aligarh Vs. Excise Commissioner and others) filed by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Vandit High Court of Judicature at Allahabad