Manish Pathak v. State of U.P

Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14404 of 2021 Applicant :- Manish Pathak Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amaresh Yadava,Dinesh Kumar Yadav,Jitendra Singh,Suneel Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶2Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that F.I.R. was lodged against Kaliya Yadav, Sanjay Yadav and one unknown person with the allegation that on the date of incident at about 9:45 p.m. accused persons came at the shop of complainant and asked money from the husband of complainant and when husband of the deceased refused to give money the accused persons shot fire upon him on account of which he died. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that applicant is not named in the F.I.R., his name came into light in the confessional statement of co-accused, Rajan Yadav before the police, which statement is not admissible under the Evidence Act. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that there is no evidence against the applicant for implicating him in the present case, there is no recovery of any weapon made by the police from the pointing out of the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that criminal history of applicant has been explained in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit dated 03.07.2023 and bail orders of the same are annexed as Annexure-S.A.-2 to the said supplementary affidavit. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since

20.03.2019 and has already undergone a substantial period of incarceration.

¶3Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that applicant has a criminal history of eight cases, in case he is enlarged on bail he will again indulge in similar activities, but he has not disputed that in all the cases into his credit he is enlarged on bail.

¶4After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court is of the view, that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶5Let applicant-Manish Pathak, involved in Case Crime No. 29 of 2019, under Sections 302, 452 I.P.C., Police Station Maharajganj, District Azamgarh, be enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

(ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under section 174-A I.P.C.

(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law and the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.

¶6The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail in accordance with law.

¶7The bail application is allowed. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Mustaqeem. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad