Yogesh Kumar Yadav @ Mantoo v. State of U.P

Court No. - 77 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49602 of 2023 Applicant :- Yogesh Kumar Yadav @ Mantoo Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rama Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2The present first bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 354 of 2023 under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. Police Station Karchhana, District Prayagraj with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

¶3Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to malafide intentions. It is submitted that the applicant is the pillion rider of the vehicle so recovered. It is further submitted that applicant has no prior criminal history, however, when the applicant was arrested in present case, he was booked in two other cases. It is contended that the motorcycle is recovered from joint possession from all the four accused persons, however, there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. It is further contended that the six motorcycles are said to have been recovered on the joint pointing out of the accused persons which are still not connected with any F.I.R. It is contended that applicant has been implicated in the present case on the ground that he was sitting as a pillion rider of the motorcycle which is connected with the case crime No. 154 of 2023. It is lastly contended that the case is triable by Magistrate and the applicant is languishing in jail since 29.09.2023 and if he is granted the liberty of bail he will not misuse the same and he is ready to furnish his sufficient sureties, bonds and personal bonds and shall co-operate in the trial.

¶4On the other hand, learned AGA has opposed the prayer of bail but could not controvert the aforesaid arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶5Considering the fact that the six motorcycles recovered from the pointing out of the present applicant and co-accused persons have not been connected with any crime so far, there is no public witness of the alleged recovery, applicant has been implicated in the present case on the ground that he was sitting as a pillion rider of the motorcycle which is connected with the case crime No. 154 of 2023, applicant has no prior criminal history, case is triable by Magistrate and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, accused-applicant is liable to be released on bail.

¶6Let applicant Yogesh Kumar Yadav @ Mantoo be released on bail in the above case crime number and on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions :-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

(v) The applicant shall also furnish an undertaking from the sureties that the properties (movable/immovable) which are the basis of accepting the surety, shall not be disposed of by them till the conclusion of trial.

(vi) The applicant shall also give an undertaking to the effect that he will not change his address without prior intimation to the trial court concerned. (Renu Agarwal,J.) Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Karan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad