- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 49702/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49702 of 2023 Applicant :- Gauri Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Goyal,Rabindra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Gauri, with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No. 302 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Khoda, District-Ghaziabad, during pendency of trial. There is allegation against the applicant of causing dowry death of her sister-in-law (Bhabhi). It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is unmarried sister-in-law (Nanad) of the deceased. She is aged about 22 years. In the post mortem report of the deceased, the cause of death of the deceased was found as asphyxia consequent upon ante mortem manual strangulation. He has submitted that the applicant has been generally implicated in this case alongwith other co-accused. She has not assigned the role of strangulating of her sister-in-law. She has no criminal history to her credit and is languishing in jail since
21.5.2023. In case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, she does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail she will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail. Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, judgement dated 11.7.2022 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of her absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against her under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against her in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and
(iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her in accordance with law. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Ruchi Agrahari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.