Rajnath Dubey v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37789 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajnath Dubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari,Rahul Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent no. 2 to provide the information sought by the petitioner according to the representation dated 17.01.2023 filed by the petitioner, which is still pending before him, within stipulated period. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance of the petitioner has not been decided, therefore, a direction may be issued to respondent no. 2 to provide the information sought by the petitioner according to the representation within stipulated period. The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. No useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending in view of the order, which the Court proposes to pass hereunder. Without entering into the controversy involved in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to decide the aforesaid representation, in accordance with law, by a speaking and reasoned order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date of producing a certified copy of this order before the concerned authority, if there is no other legal impediment. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the merits of the claim of the petitioner and the authority concerned shall apply its own mind strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Arti High Court of Judicature at Allahabad