Vishwadeep Arora v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27873 of 2023 Petitioner :- Vishwadeep Arora Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Abhishek Srivastava Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard Sri Abhishek Kumar Chaubey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Srivastava, who appears for respondent nos. 2, 3, 5 and 6 and Sri Devansh Rathore, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 and 4.

¶2By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following principal reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to renew the agreement in the name of the petitioner for Flat no. 54 Type IV, situated at Anpara Tapiya Pariyojana Colony Premises, Anpara Sonbhadara, in view of the notice dated 07.12.2022 issued by Executive Engineer, Electricity Civil Maintenance Division, IV, Anpara Thermal Power Project, Anpara, Sonbhadra. ii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from evicting the petitioner from Flat no. 54 Type IV, situated at Anpara Tapiya Pariyojana Colony Premises, Anpara Sonbhadara under his possession which have allotted by the Anpara Tapiya Pariyojana, Uttar Pradesh Raj Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Anpara, Sonbhadra to the petitioner through the allotment letters dated 25.04.2006/15.05.2006. iii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representation (Annexure No. 5) of the petitioner in regard to illegal, arbitrary dispossession from his Flat no. 54 Type IV, situated at Anpara Tapiya Pariyojana Colony Premises, Anpara Sonbhadara. iv. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from disconnecting the electricity/water supply of the above mentioned flat."

¶3After substantial arguments once the Court has declined to interfere, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not inclined to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.

¶4Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Vikram High Court of Judicature at Allahabad