- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Case no.
- A227 11769/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 44 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11769 of 2023 Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Respondent :- Niyamat And 24 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
¶1Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶2Considering the nature of that order that is proposed to be passed the notice upon the respondent nos. 2 to 25 is dispensed with.
¶3The limited prayer made by the petitioner in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is that learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 3, Jaunpur be directed to decide the interim injunction application registered as Paper No. 6-C filed in Original Suit No. 82 of 2013 within a time frame fixed by this Court.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the defendant in the Suit No. 82 of 2013 which has been instituted for permanent injunction. The interim injunction is operating against him and he has already filed his objections to the interim injunction application. However, the 6-C application has not been decided till date, even though the said application is stated to be pending since 22.01.2013.
¶5Considering the facts that the interim injunction application is pending consideration before the court concerned since
22.01.2013, this court deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur seized with the interim injunction application (6-C) filed in Original Suit No. 82 of 2013 to consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of service of certified copy of the order of this Court in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Manoj High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.