- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIA 19438/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19438 of 2023 Petitioner :- Avinash Kumar Yadav Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
¶1Considering the prayer made in the writ petition, as it is directed against the railways, which stands notified under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, preliminary objection raised by Sri Vijay Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents regarding maintainability of this petition before this Court, holds merit.
¶2Accordingly, I decline to entertain this petition at this stage. However, liberty rests with the petitioner to apply before the Central Administrative Tribunal, if so advised.
¶3Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 P Kesari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.