- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Case no.
- A482 16134/2018
Judgment
Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16134 of 2018 Applicant :- Shishir Kumar Kapoor And 8 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Shilpa Ahuja Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
¶1Heard Ms. Shilpa Ahuja, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.
¶2The instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 29.1.2015 in Complaint Case No. 2146 of 2014 (Muzammil Vs. Shishir Kumar Kapoor and others) under sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC police station Didauli District Amroha passed by A.C.J.M. Amroha and also to direct the learned C.J.M. Amroha to consider and decide the complaint case No. 6449 of 2015 under sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC police station Didauli District Amroha in pursuance of the compromise dated 18.12.2017 which is pending before learned C.J.M. Amroha.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the matter between the parties has already been settled. Vide order dated
19.4.2023 this court directed the parties to file compromise before the trial court and to file the verified copy of the compromise by the trial court. In terms of the order dated 19.4.2023 the compromise entered into between the parties has been verified on
30.5.2023 and the report to the said effect has been received from the III Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate alongwith certified copy of the order and the compromise.
¶4Since the allegations against the applicants were casual in nature, a final report has been filed which was protested and upon protest the summoning order was issued against the applicants on
29.1.2015. Parties have already settled their dispute outside the court and the compromise has been executed which has also been verified by the trial court concerned. With the aforesaid settlement, the peace will prevail over the society and continuance of trial of the aforesaid criminal case will not serve any fruitful purpose.
¶5In view thereof and in the light of the judgements in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another (2012) 10 SCC 303, Narinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466 and Prabatbhai Aahir alias Prabatbhai Bhimsinghbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another (2017) 9 SCC 641, the entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case are hereby quashed.
¶6The application is allowed. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 o.k. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.