- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 40317/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40317 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rishabh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Singh Paliwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gyan Prakash Shrivastava Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Gyan Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the Bank.
¶2This writ petition has been filed against the notice dated
9.10.2023 issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
¶3Learned counsel for the Bank submits that when the petitioner has been served with the notice, he can always represent the Bank with regard to payment of loan.
¶4Under such circumstances, no interference is warranted. The writ petition is disposed with liberty to the petitioner to represent the matter before the Bank. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Rakesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.