VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Kumar Agrawal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
22 November 2023
Case no.
A482 42055/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42055 of 2023 Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Agrawal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Rajput Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.

¶1Heard Sri Dharmendra Kumar Rajput, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anish Kumar Upadhyay, learned AGA for the State.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking direction to the learned Trial Court to decide the Complaint Case No.324 of 2021 (Vijay Kumar Agrawal v. Shashi Singh and others), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, P.S. Quarsi, District Aligarh, expeditiously within the stipulated period.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant complaint case is pending since January 2021 and more than two and half years have passed, but the trial has not yet been concluded. The instant case, the evidence on behalf of the complainant has already been completed and the statement of accused was also recorded under Section 313. However, the matter is pending for the defence evidence since 23.5.2023, more than six months have passed and due to non co-operation of opposite party no.2, the matter is not proceedings and being adjourned from time to time as he has failed to lead the defence evidence in the instant case. Learned counsel for the applicant pointing out the provisions of Section 143 of Negotiable Instrument Act submits that the proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act are required to be concluded within a period of six months, however, in the said case about more than two and half years have passed and the proceedings could not be concluded. Therefore, he has prayed for a direction for expeditious disposal of the said complaint case.

¶4Having regard to the provisions of Section 143 of Negotiable Instrument Act, learned AGA did not oppose the prayer made by the applicant herein.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and specifically the provisions of Section 143 of Negotiable Instrument Act, the Trial Court is directed to make an endeavor to decide the above case in accordance with the provisions of Section 143 of Negotiable Instrument Act expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournment to the parties concerned.

¶6With the aforesaid observation, the instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 A.N. Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.