VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Brijpal Singh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
22 November 2023
Case no.
WRIC 35184/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35184 of 2023 Petitioner :- Brijpal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Narayan Singh,Satendra Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The present petition has been filed for the following relief: " i) - Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of 2023 certiorari for quashing the order dated 24.08.2023 passed by respondent No.2 in Revision Case No. 2082/2022, Computerized Case No. C202203000002082 (Brijpal Singh Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and others) U/S 210 U.P.Revenue Code-2006 and order dated

01.07.2022 passed by respondent No.3 in Case No. 04482/2021, Computerized Case No. T202103390104482 (Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Gaon Sabha) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code-2006 (Annexure No. 5 & 1 to this writ petition)

ii)- Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to respondent authorities that during the pendency of Probate Suit not create the 3rd party right to any person."

¶3The property in dispute belongs to one Kedar Singh. After his death, the dispute arose between the petitioner, who claims on the basis of will in his favour executed by Kedar Singh, and the respondent Nos. 5 and 6, who are the daughters of Kedar Singh. In mutation proceedings, the petitioner lost from the original court and the revision filed by the petitioner against the said order has also been dismissed.

¶4Sri Satendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel representing respondent Nos. 5 & 6 has submitted that both the authorities have recorded a concurrent finding disapproving the will in favour of the petitioner and further that in case, the petitioner is aggrieved, the petitioner may institute a declaratory suit under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for declaring his rights.

¶5In view of the findings recorded by the court below, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶6Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. Order Date :- 23.11.2023/Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.