- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 40244/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40244 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dheer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Upadhyay, Asharaphee Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Shri P.K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
¶2The present writ petition has been preferred for the following principal reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 17.11.2022 passed by the respondent no.2 and recovery notice dated 31.12.2022 issued by respondent no. 2.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to recover the penalty of Rs. 2,70,000/- pursuant to the recovery certificate dated 31.12.2022 issued pursuant to the impugned order dated 17.11.2022 passed by respondent no. 2."
¶3Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the order impugned, the petitioner has efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 70 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and as such, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
¶4Once against the impugned order efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioner then there is no reason or occasion for this Court to intervene in the matter.
¶5In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that if the petitioner files an appeal against the impugned order within a week's time from today, the Appellate Authority will decide the same on merits expeditiously. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Rama Kant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.