Trilok Chandra Sharma and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16789 of 2006 Applicant :- Trilok Chandra Sharma And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Brij Raj Mishra Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.

¶1None appears for the applicant to press this application. Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. is present for the State.

¶2On 26.9.2023 this Court passed the following order: "1. None appears for the applicants as well as the opposite party no. 2.

¶2Since, this is a very old matter, put up peremptorily on 10.10.2023 in additional cause list."

¶3On 26.10.2023 this Court passed the following order: "1. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Sandeep Chaudhary, learned AGA for the State.

¶2In the instant case, notice was issued to opposite party no.2 on 18.12.2006 and the proceedings against the applicant nos.2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 were stayed. However, the proceedings against the applicant no.1 were directed to be continued.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submits that he is not aware about the status of the parties. As per his instructions, applicant nos.1, 2 and 3 have already expired. He seeks further time to take instruction with regard to the applicant nos.4, 5 and 6.

¶4The interim protection granted to the applicant nos.4, 5 and 6 is also vacated.

¶5Registrar compliance is directed to inform about the vacation of the interim order against applicant nos.4, 5 and 6 to the trial court concerned.

¶6Put up this matter on 23.11.2023 peremptorily.

¶7This case shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to this Bench."

¶4Despite the aforesaid orders none is present on behalf of the applicant to press the instant application. Therefore, the instant application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶5Interim order, if any, is also vacated. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 o.k. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad