Shyam Babu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34199 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shyam Babu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

1.Heard Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajmohan Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

¶2The petitioner claims to be uncle of a missing 26 years old boy. Grievance of the petitioner is that till date, the police has not lodged first information report.

¶3As per order dated 06.10.2023, Sri Rajmohan Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has placed on record detailed instructions and it is claimed that not only missing report has been lodged but father of the alleged missing nephew of the petitioner has also given notarized affidavit wherein he has submitted that at no point of time, any leave was accorded to the petitioner to file the writ petition. He has also placed certain photographs and claimed that the missing person has got married. Moreover, the petitioner has been apprised that missing report has already been lodged.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to proceed further in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 NLY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad