- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 23 November 2023
- Case no.
- A482 39911/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39911 of 2023 Applicant :- Meharban Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sayyed Kashif Abbas Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
¶2The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed praying for quashing the summoning order dated 29.09.2023 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gyanpur Bhadoshi as well as proceedings of Section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. dated 10.07.2023 in Case No.1177 of 2012 (State vs. Nadeem & Others) arising out of Case Crime No.93 of 2012, under Section 307 I.P.C., Section 3/5A/8 of Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act and Section 48, 49, 50, 52, 54 and 56 of Transportation Act, Police Station Aurai, District Sant Ravidas Nagar.
¶3After some argument learned counsel for the applicant submitted that proceeding under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. has been issued by the trial against the applicant vide order dated
10.07.2023. He next submitted that and he does not want to press this application, therefore this application may be dismissed as not pressed with certain protection to enable him to file application for recalling of the order dated 10.07.2023.
¶4In view of facts and circumstances of the case, the application is dismissed as not pressed. It is directed that if the applicant moves an application for recalling the order dated
10.07.2023 before the court below within fifteen days from today, his prayer for recalling the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
¶5For a period of fifteen days from today, the proceeding under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. issued against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance.
¶6The present application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 Amit/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.