VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Savitri Devi and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
23 November 2023
Case no.
WRIC 40566/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40566 of 2023 Petitioner :- Savitri Devi And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shesh Nath Singh Yadav,Ranjana Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.

¶2This writ petition has been filed for following prayer: "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondent No.2 to decide the complaint and correct the Khasra of Khata No.840/1 Area 0.170 hectare of Fasali Year 1428 to till date, pending before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Sadar, District Ghazipur within stipulated period."

¶3Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that from the relief claimed by the petitioners as well as from the representation, it appears that petitioners want correction in the revenue entries, for that, a procedure has been prescribed under Section 38(1) of the UP Revenue Code, 2006.

¶4In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, in case, such an application be moved by the petitioner under Section 38(1) of the UP Revenue Code, 2006 for redressal of grievance, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the application along with this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 Priya High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.