- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 23 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36676/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36676 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dharmendra Singh Batham Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Pandey,Mahesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Narayan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition on the ground that the petitioner has an alternative remedy for redressal of his grievance under Section 66 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with alternative remedy.
¶4Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with alternative remedy as available to him in accordance with law. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 A Gautam High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.