- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 23 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 40426/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40426 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naghma Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 0056/2023 being Computerized Case No. T202314360100056 (Naghma Bano Vs. Mirza Ahsad) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner states that opposite parties have appeared before the court below. The aforesaid case is pending since 2023 before respondent No. 2 for adjudication. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
¶4From perusal of the order sheet, annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition, it appears that several dates have been fixed by the Court concerned, however, till date, the aforesaid case has not been decided.
¶5No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2-Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil-Shahganj, District-Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.