VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Irfan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
27 November 2023
Case no.
BAIL 31913/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 75 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31913 of 2023 Applicant :- Irfan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Khalil,Mohd. Afzal Ansari,Rajrshi Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Daga,Durgesh Kumar Pandey,Shivamtyagi Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶1Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

¶2Heard Sri Rajrshi Gupta alongwith Sri Mohd. Khalil, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Sri Amit Daga, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.

¶3By means of this bail application, applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.370 of 2016, under Section 376D IPC and Section 5G/16, 16/17 POCSO Act, Police Station Jani, District Meerut, during the pendency of trial.

¶4This is the second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant. Earlier on 14.03.203 though the bail application with regard to the accused, Shaukin was allowed but in respect of rest of the accused including the present applicant was rejected.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied on the statement on oath of the victim which has been annexed as annexure-1 to the supplementary affidavit in which the victim has clearly deposed that the present applicant had neither kept her in his vehicle nor raped or did any bad deed with her. There is no criminal history of the applicant. There is no likelihood of his abscondence or tampering with the evidence. The applicant is languishing in jail since 08.07.2022. In case the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶6Learned AGA and the learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail but they could not dispute the aforesaid submissions advanced by the counsel for the applicant and also the contents of the statement on oath deposed by the victim.

¶7Considering the facts, circumstances and the submissions made as well as the statement on oath given by the victim, this Court is of opinion that the applicant has made out a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶8Let the applicant - Irfan, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he:

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶9In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 28.11.2023 Shahroz High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.