Nirmala Shukla v. Smt Jyoti Maurya and Another

Court No. - 9 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6158 of 2021 Applicant :- Nirmala Shukla Opposite Party :- Smt Jyoti Maurya And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Shukla Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶1The writ Court on 16.12.2020 while disposing of Writ - C No.22363 of 2020 passed the following order : "Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the application dated

6.8.2019 filed by him for demarcation of certain plots were not being decided. It has been stated that the application was in consonance with the provisions of Rule 22 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. Prayer has been made that a direction be issued that the application be decided within a stipulated period of time. Under such circumstances without going into the merits of the case it is being directed that the application after being given a number be decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a copy of this order. The copy is to be duly certified by the counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of."

¶2A compliance affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State wherein, in paras 5 and 6 it has been stated that the demarcation proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been concluded by the revenue authority and an order has been passed on 30.03.2022, a copy of which has been brought on record as Annexure 1 to the compliance affidavit.

¶3In view of the said fact, as the order of the writ Court has been complied with, the contempt application has rendered infructuous and stands dismissed.

¶4Contempt notice stands discharged. Order Date :- 28.11.2023 Kushal High Court of Judicature at Allahabad