VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kallu v. Shri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Managing Director, and 2 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
27 November 2023
Case no.
CAPL 1567/2021

Judgment

Court No. - 9 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1567 of 2021 Applicant :- Kallu Opposite Party :- Shri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Managing Director, And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod K. Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- Mukesh Kumar Kushwaha Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶1The writ Court on 21.11.2019 while disposing of Writ - A No.15156 of 2019 passed the following order : "Petitioner has approached this Court with the grievance that his retiral benefits due and payable to him have not been released. Learned counsel for the respondent U.P. Bridge Corporation has obtained instructions, according to which, certain formalities towards processing of retiral dues were awaited on account of which petitioner's claim could not be processed. It is stated that in case petitioner completes requisite formalities his claim would be processed immediately. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall render all assistance and complete requisite formalities for processing his claim. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, it would be appropriate to permit the petitioner to appear before respondent no.5 alongwith certified copy of this order on 26.11.2019 and all requisite formalities that are required to be completed by the petitioner would be undertaken within a week thereafter. The claim of petitioner thereafter would be processed and the amount due and payable to petitioner would be released within a further period of two months, thereafter. The details of the amount sanctioned to petitioner towards retiral dues would also be disclosed to him. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition stands disposed."

¶2Today, when the matter was taken up, Sri Nagesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for opposite party, has placed before the Court the instructions so received by him, which is taken on record.

¶3According to the said instructions, the claim of the applicant, as directed by the writ Court was decided on 12.06.2020.

¶4In view of the said fact, as the order of the writ Court has been complied with, the contempt application has rendered infructuous and stands dismissed. Order Date :- 28.11.2023 Kushal High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.