- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 33773/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33773 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.P. Srivastava,Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.C.Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
¶2At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer that the direction may be issued to the second respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 4.9.2023 (Annexure no. 3 to the writ petition).
¶3Learned Standing Counsel fairly states that in case the aforesaid representation is still pending, definitely, the same would be considered and decided expeditiously.
¶4In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the second respondent to look into the grievance of the petitioner and decide the aforesaid representation within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order but certainly after affording opportunity to all stakeholders in the matter. Order Date :- 28.11.2023 A.K.Srivastava High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.