- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 November 2023
- Case no.
- A227 11035/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11035 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Shumbul Begum Respondent :- Mohammad Hashim And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shahid Ali Siddiqui,Shamsuddin Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Agrawal Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
¶1Ari Azizur Rahman Khan, learned counsel has put up his appearance on behalf of the petitioner and filed his vakalatnama today in the Court. The same is taken on record.
¶2Sri Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of contesting respondent submits that against the judgment and decree dated 20.4.2022, a regular appeal being Civil Appeal No. 177 of 2023 (Smt. Sumbul Begum Vs. Mohd. Hashim) has been filed by the petitioner. Along with the said appeal, applications being Application No.7-C and Application No.22-C has also filed by the petitioner. The said applications were rejected vide order
20.11.2023 passed by Additional Special Judge (POCSO Act) Court No.2, Prayagraj. Copy of the order placed before this Court. The same is taken on record.
¶3Hence, in view of the aforesaid, no relief could be granted to the petitioner. It is next argued that the decree passed by the court below has already been satisfied and the possession of the premises has been handed over to the landlord. Though this fact has been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner but ultimately a prayer has been made to dismiss the present petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 20.11.2023.
¶4In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed with the liberty as prayed. Order Date :- 28.11.2023 S.K. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.