- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 3945/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3945 of 2023 Petitioner :- Suraj Prasad Sonkar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶1Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶2This writ petition could be disposed of with the observation that revision petition pending before the concerned authority since 2016 be decided expeditiously since it is reflected in the order sheet that on many occasions matter has been adjourned due to call of Advocates for abstention from judicial work, therefore, it is directed that petitioner himself or through his Advocate shall remain present before the court concerned on each and every date even there is a call of Advocates for abstention from judicial work. In default, the court concerned can refer the matter to Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh against the concerned Advocate.
¶3With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 SB High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.