- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 39006/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39006 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sudhanshu Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State. The present writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing respondent no. 3 to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner on 13.12.2015 within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that representation filed by petitioner is pending since 13.12.2015 and same may be decided within the stipulated time. The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. No useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending in view of the order, which the Court proposes to pass hereunder. Without entering into the controversy involved in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 3 to decide the representation expeditiously, after hearing the parties concerned, in accordance with law provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Rahul Dwivedi/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.