- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 38936/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38936 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shiv Narayan Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Khare,Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State. The present writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing respondent no. 2 to decide Adjudication Case No. 18 of 2017 (Shiv Narayan Yadav Vs. M/s Sammelan Mudralaya Prayag) within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that adjudication case of the petitioner is pending since 20.3.2017 and same may be decided within the stipulated time. The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. No useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending in view of the order, which the Court proposes to pass hereunder. Without entering into the controversy involved in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the Adjudication Case No. 18 of 2017 (Shiv Narayan Yadav Vs. M/s Sammelan Mudralaya Prayag) , expeditiously, after hearing the parties concerned, in accordance with law provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Rahul Dwivedi/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.