- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35270/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35270 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Dular Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Sri Anurag Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.C. Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Sri Ravindra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the intervener.
¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that dumps of the filth lying in the residential area may be directed to be removed by the respondent authorities.
¶3In this backdrop, this Court has asked the learned Standing Counsel to seek instructions vide order dated 30.10.2023.
¶4Sri Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate, who has entered on behalf of intervener in the midst of the proceedings, states that there is civil dispute between the parties and even the petitioner has filed suit for injunction, which is pending consideration before the Court below. The said factual aspect has been concealed by the petitioner and aforementioned relief is directly against the contesting respondent whereas he is agitating the grievance before the competent Civil Court, therefore, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed with exemplary cost on the ground of concealment of material facts.
¶5When confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not inclined to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
¶6The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Manish Himwan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.