VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Khushboo and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 November 2023
Case no.
HABC 672/2023

Judgment

RESERVED ON 22.11.2023 DELIVERED ON 30.11.2023 Court No. - 82 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 672 of 2023 Petitioner :- Khushboo And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Kumar Amit Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and Sri Kumar Amit, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 3. In the instant habeas corpus writ petition, the petitioner no. 2 Rohan Maurya has sought the custody of petitioner no. 1 Khushboo (corpus) claiming her as his wife. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 states that the custody of the corpus Khushboo Yadav (minor daughter) has been given to the respondent no. 3 (father of the corpus) on the basis of the order passed by Child Welfare Committee, Prayagraj dated 03.02.2023. In the Full Bench decision rendered by the Allahabad High Court in Rachna and Another vs. State of U.P. and others, AIR 2021 All. 109, it has been held that a Writ of Habeas Corpus would not be maintainable if the detention of custody is pursuant to judicial orders passed by a Judicial Magistrate or a Court of Competent Jurisdiction or by the Child Welfare Committee. In case, corpus is aggrieved by order of Child Welfare Committee she is at liberty to take recourse of remedy of an appeal or revision provided under Sections 101 and 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the petition is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Puspendra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.