VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajiv Kumar Upadhyay v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 November 2023
Case no.
A482 37184/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37184 of 2023 Applicant :- Rajiv Kumar Upadhyay Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the order dated 29.09.2020 passed by Session Judge Sambhal at Chandausi in Criminal Appeal No.17/2019 (Rajiv Kumar Upadhyay Vs. Kusumlata and Another) as well as order dated 21.08.2019 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.)/ JUdicial Magistrate, Sambhal at Chandausi in Complaint Case No. 1192 of 2022 (Old No. 1349/2019) (Kusumlata Vs. Rajiv Kumar Upadhyay), under sections 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Police Station Chandausi, District-Sambhal and further prayer to stay the proceedings of the aforesaid case has been made.

¶3It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that a plea was taken before the appellate court that an application under section 125 Cr.P.C. has already been decided against the applicant in which an allowance of Rs.4,000/- has been allowed which is being paid to the opposite party no.2. Contention is that the submission/ plea has not been considered by the appellate court while passing the impugned order.

¶4Per contra, learned A.G.A. contended that so far as the submissions/ pleas raised by the learned counsel for the applicant, he has still an opportunity to move an application before the trial Court for the adjustment of the same while issuing recovery warrant against the applicant.

¶5In view of above, the application is disposed of with the direction to the applicant to move an application before the trial Court for adjustment of the maintenance amount already ordered under section 125 Cr.P.C. and the court concerned may decide the same in the light of law laid down by Supreme Court in Rajnesh Vs. Neha and Another, reported in (2021) 2 SCC 324 in accordance with law. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Shiv High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.