Raghunandan Prasad Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42623 of 2023 Applicant :- Raghunandan Prasad Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA.

¶2Learned AGA pointed out that earlier applicant had filed two 482 applications being Application U/S 482 Nos. 34208 of 2012 and 29645 of 2017 and these facts have been concealed while filing affidavit in the present application. Therefore, this application may be dismissed with exemplary costs.

¶3At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he does not want to press this application, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed for which learned AGA has no objection.

¶4Considering the request of applicant, the application is dismissed as not pressed with warning the applicant for his conduct and in case, applicant adopts the same tactics in future, Court may proceed to initiate proceeding of forgery. It is made clear that no liberty is granted to the applicant by this Court to file fresh application for the same cause of action. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Arvind High Court of Judicature at Allahabad