- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 39990/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39990 of 2023 Petitioner :- Nokhe Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Singh Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.
¶1Heard Sri Rajiv Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Electricity Department and learned Standing Counsel.
¶2Learned counsel for the Electricity Department states that against the demand notice dated 7.6.2022 issued under Section 3 of the U.P. Government Undertaking (Dues Recovery) Act, 1958, the petitioner was required to file reply. If the petitioner is so advised, he may file reply to that notice.
¶3Under such circumstances, we are refraining from interfering. The Court also notes that the demand notice was issued on
7.6.2022 and the petitioner has approached this Court in the month of November, 2023.
¶4The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Rakesh (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.